City of South Miami is treading water on a new city hall and police station

Seems like voters are swimming uphill to get a new city hall, with a 13-month delay and counting – that’s the average gestation period of a whale!
Seems like voters are swimming uphill to get a new city hall, with a 13-month delay and counting – that’s the average gestation period of a whale!
Seems like voters are swimming uphill to get a new city hall, with a 13-month delay and counting – that’s the average gestation period of a whale!

Letter to the Editor

It was 13 months ago, on Nov. 8, 2016, we witnessed as 72.24 percent of the voters in the City of South Miami clearly told our mayor and city commission that they wanted a new city hall and police station. The voters made it clear they recognized that using the value of this underutilized and outdated property was the way to realize much-needed city amenities.

If the value of the city hall property was more than what it would take to build a new city hall and police station then there could be significant monetary benefits realized by the taxpayers. With proper utilization, taxpayers might reap additional ad valorem tax revenue of $800,000-plus a year (which will likely grow).

The city did its part and put out multiple RFPs. As a result, six qualified proposals were submitted to the city which gave a value of around $24 million – more than enough to build a new city hall and police station.

A second RFP was released asking interested entities to propose a public-private partnership to see if that route would be better for the city. That effort reaped four legitimate responses.

The city manager, inexplicably and to this day without any explanation, withdrew the RFPs and cancelled the entire process. 

So what happened? Why has this process stalled?

Other than constantly questioning by Commissioner Liebman of the other commissioners and city staff, there has been no response for the taxpayers and voters. Not even within the city staff has had the decency to explain to the electorate why their wishes have not been acted on. 

There appears to be a disconnect between the city and its electorate. With elections in a month, maybe this is a time for change.


Connect To Your Customers & Grow Your Business

Click Here

1 COMMENT

  1. Sorry, the truth continues to be hidden. The verbage of the ballot question was flawed, written to entice residents only to vote yes, but more importantly, it was a straw ballot, which is not a real ballot question and Comm. Liebman knows that but continues to lie publically that the public voted for it.

    The public hasn’t asked about a new city hall because they now know Comm. Liebman has been lying all along about it.

    If they truly want a new city hall, put a real ballot question on the ballot and not a straw ballot. Everyone really wants to know why Comm. Liebman is so hell bent on this issue, perhaps questioning Liebman if he has a full time job and why he can’t pay his own health insurance and have the Sm taxpayers pick up the tab is a more appropriate question

Comments are closed.